2025 № 1 Електротехніка і Електромеханіка

Постійне посилання колекціїhttps://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/85226

Переглянути

Фільтри

20251

Налаштування

Кінцева дата: 2025Ключові слова: search.filters.subject.artificial bee colony algorithm

Результати пошуку

Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
  • Ескіз
    Документ
    Optimization of fractional PI controller parameters for enhanced induction motor speed control via indirect field-oriented control
    (Національний технічний університет "Харківський політехнічний інститут", 2025) Alnaib, I. I.; Alsammak, A. N.
    Induction Motors (IM) possess advantages such as stability, reliability, and ease of control, making them suitable for many purposes; the literature elucidates control methodologies for IM drives, primarily focusing on scalar and vector control techniques; the conventional method utilized in manufacturing is scalar control, which unfortunately demonstrates optimal performance solely in steady-state conditions. The absence of significant instantaneous torque control restricts flux and dissociated torque, resulting in subpar dynamic responsiveness. Indirect Field Oriented Control (IFOC) for IM drives has proven beneficial for various industrial applications, particularly electric vehicle propulsion. The primary advantages of this approach include the decoupling of torque and flux characteristics and its straightforward implementation. The novelty of the work consists of a proposal for a driving cycle model for testing the control system of electric vehicles in Mosul City (Iraq), and using a Complex Fractional Order Proportional Integral (CFOPI) controller to control IMs via IFOC strategies, the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm was applied, which is considered to be highly efficient in finding the values of controllers. Purpose. Improvement IFOC techniques for the regulation of IM speed. Methods. Using the ABC algorithm in tuning the two unique CFOPI controller, and a Real Fractional Order Proportional Integral (RFOPI) controller, to regulate the speed of a three-phase IM via IFOC techniques. Results. The CFOPI controller outperforms the RFOPI controller in obtaining the best performance in controlling the IM. Practical value. The CFOPI controller demonstrates superiority over the RFOPI controller, as evidenced by the lower integral time absolute error in motor speed tracking during the driving cycle 2.1004 for the CFOPI controller compared to 2.1538 for the RFOPI controller.