Некоторые аспекты проблем третейских судов

Abstract

В статье раскрывается понимание института третейского судопроизводства. Приведены исторические факты возникновения третейских и общественных судов. Обосновывают- ся причины возникновения третейских судов в Украине. Анализируется исполнение решений третейских судов, участие в этом процессе органов государственной власти. Акцентируется внимание на том, что принудительное исполнение решений третейских судов находится вне пределов третейского рассмотрения споров, а является заданием компетентных судов и государственной исполнительной службы.

The article deals with the understanding of arbitration proceedings. Given the historical facts of occurrence of arbitration and public courts. Justified by reasons of arbitration courts in Ukraine. We analyze the performance of arbitration decisions, participate in the process of public authorities. Attention is drawn to the fact that the enforcement of arbitral awards is outside the arbitration dispute resolution and is a task of the competent courts and the state executive service. Relevance of the study due to the fact that since the adoption in 2004 Law of Ukraine "On arbitration courts" was not long, however, as the longawaited legalization in Ukraine arbitration already capable of destroying the institution itself. This trend has become critical and demands immediate attention, because of the advantages and democratic method of resolving disputes justly earned widespread in many jurisdictions economically developed and developing countries alone. Today, following the practice of arbitration in Ukraine, many articles of the Law require changes. Arbitration should not be a tool in the hands of a legally illiterate, unscrupulous people who see in it only a way to improve personal well-being. In the process of getting rid of this kind of arbitration "judges" of the great role of the Ministry of Justice and Arbitration Chamber of Ukraine.